Recommendations
Made by the First Inter-Regional Coordination
Workshop on SEO registration and licensing of
specific activities
3. Detailed comments to
the recommendations
3.1 State registration
-
The development and implementation of the
concept of a dedicated federal law on firms
(trademarks) independently of the Law studied.
In agreement with
the provision of Article 54 of the Civil Code
of Russian Federation, the law and other regulations
govern the procedure of using the business
name of a legal entity. Today this issue is
regulated by the "Statute of a firm", approved
by the Enactment of the Central Executive
Committee of the USSR of June 22, 1927. However,
due to the fact that the state registration
of economic operators is tightly linked to
business names, it seems necessary to pass
the federal Law on business names of legal
entities, corresponding to modern economic
reality, together with the Law on state registration.
In agreement with the provision of Article
54 of the Civil Code of Russian Federation,
the law and other regulations govern the procedure
of using the business name of a legal entity.
Today this issue is regulated by the "Statute
of a firm", approved by the Enactment of the
Central Executive Committee of the USSR of
June 22, 1927. However, due to the fact that
the state registration of economic operators
is tightly linked to business names, it seems
necessary to pass the federal Law on business
names of legal entities, corresponding to
modern economic reality, together with the
Law on state registration.
-
When passing the Law, it is necessary to
solve the issue of the legal nature of the
registration fee.
The state registration
is a permit issued by the state, which envisages
a collection of a certain monetary fee for
the conduct of legally meaningful actions
in respect of the founders of an economic
operator to be registered. In this aspect
the relationships arising are subjected to
the jurisdiction of the Tax Code of Russian
Federation, defining:
- all types of taxes and fees collected in
Russian Federation;
- the reasons for obligations related to payment
of taxes and fees to arise (modify, terminate)
and the procedure of their fulfillment;
- the rights and obligations of tax payers,
tax bodies and other parties to the relationships
governed by the legislation on taxes and fees.
In this aspect a fee
is understood to be a compulsory contribution
collected from the organizations, its payment
being one of the prerequisites of taking juridically
meaningful steps by state bodies, bodies of
local self-government, other authorized bodies
and their officials in respect of the payers
of these fees (Article 8 of the Tax Code of
RF).
Articles 13 - 15 of
the Tax Code of Russian Federation define
the types of federal, regional and local taxes
and fees. However, according to Article 6
of the Federal Law "On implementation of the
second part of the Tax Code of Russian Federation
and amendments to individual legislative acts
on taxation", the provisions of Articles 13-15
currently do not apply, until the Law of RSFSR
(RSFSR stands for Russian Soviet Federative
Socialist Republic and is referred to the
times of the USSR. Some laws of RSFSR are
still in force within the system of current
Russian legislation.) "On the basics of
tax system in Russian Federation" is proved
null and void. This is why the existing system
of taxes and fees is defined by Articles 19-20
of the Law of RSFSR "On the basics of tax
system in Russian Federation" (Article
3 of the Federal Law of July 31, 1998 ¹ 147-FZ
"On implementation of Part 1 of the Tax Code
of Russian Federation" (as edited by the Federal
Law ¹ 118-FZ of August 5, 2000)). In this
case the taxes, duties, fees and other payments
to budget non-budget fund, not stipulated
by Articles 19, 20 and 21 of the Law of RSFSR
"On the basics of tax system in Russian Federation"
are not collected (Article 2 of the Federal
Law "On implementation of Part 1 of the Tax
Code of Russian Federation"). Should we
analyze the provisions of Articles 19, 20
and 21 of the Law of RSFSR mentioned above,
we may conclude that no collection of fee
for the registration of a legal entity is
envisaged by the federal legislation. Consequently,
the said registration fee can be set forth
neither by federal laws, nor by the laws of
RF entities or by the acts of law issued by
local self-governments, until the amendments
are made to the Law of RSFSR "On the basics
of the tax system in Russian Federation".
Thus, to have the
collection of a registration fee legalized
it is necessary to draft a federal law "On
making changes and amendments to the Law of
RSFSR "On the basics of tax system in Russian
Federation".
-
The Law should exhaustively regulate the
issues of exclusion from the Uniform State
Register.
It
seems necessary to give a special attention
to the procedures of excluding an economic
operator from the Uniform State register when
drafting the Law. The possibility to use the
administrative procedure for the exclusion
from the register, as well as individual cases
of exclusion through a court procedure should
be envisaged, too.
3.2
Licensing
-
Envisage the submission of information
by the registration body on request of
the licensing body.
Due to the fact
that a considerable amount of information
on the activity of economic operators
is supposed to be entered into the Uniform
State Register, it seems feasible to bind
the registration body to submit the information
necessary to issue a license on request
of a licensing body.
-
Reduction of activities to be licensed.
The experts proposed
to have only those activities licensed,
that are executed in the spheres most
sensitive for the state, and which regulation
can not be possibly effected by any other
administrative means (i.e., certification,
accreditation etc.) but by licensing only.
-
The need to list all the licensed activities
in one document (a Law).
According to the Federal
Law "On licensing of specific activities"
in force, both the activities listed in Article
17 of the said Law and these listed in other
regulations are subject to licensing. These
"other regulations" are so abundant, that
today this or that question related to licensing
is often solved very differently by individual
regulations. The list of the activities to
be licensed concentrated in one legislative
act would allow to bring the relationships
on licensing of specific activities to order.
-
Definition of specific licensing terms
and requirements, restricting them down to
the requirements really necessary for the
given licensed activity.
According to the Federal
Law "On licensing of specific activities",
non-adherence to the licensing requirements
may entail the termination of a license. The
law also defines the list of compulsory licensing
terms and conditions, which are "adherence
to the legislation, environmental, sanitary
and epidemiological, hygiene, fire-fighting
norms and rules, as well as provisions on
licensing of specific activities". Thus, the
Law does not give a clear and transparent
definition of licensing terms and requirements.
This is why such a regulation, taken together
with the right of a licensing body "to conduct
inspections of a licensee's activity for the
adherence of the activity executed by it to
the licensing terms and requirements" makes
arbitrariness more than possible. On the one
hand, any minor violation of the legislation
may entail the procedure of a license termination;
on the other hand, a licensing body is entitled
to inspect any aspect of a licensee's activity.
In connection with
the above the experts proposed to modify the
Law "On licensing of specific activities"
with the amendments defining "the licensing
terms and conditions" as terms of adherence
to the legislation related to the execution
of the respective licensed activity.
-
Regulating the issues of license extension
and its terms and conditions by the Law.
Today the extension
of a license validity is done according to
the Federal Law mentioned above in conformity
with the procedure set forth for its obtaining.
According to the experts, it makes the procedure
unnecessarily complex. The absence of a documentary
proof of violation of licensing terms and
requirements by a licensee is proposed as
a condition of a license extension. In other
words, should there be no violations in the
licensed activity pursued by a licensee, the
procedure of a license extension for another
period should exclusively consist of the entrepreneur's
application for the license extension and
the respective authorization of the licensing
body.
The experts also proposed
to study the possibility of issuing a license
without time limit.
4.
Addressees of the recommendations
-
The
ministry of Economic Development and Trade
of Russian Federation
-
B.
The Committee for Entrepreneurship of the
State Duma of Russian Federation;
-
C.
The Ministry of Justice of Russian Federation;
-
D.
Higher executive bodies of Russian Federation
entities.
|
|
|
Interregional
Seminar
Detailed
comments to
the recommendations
|